Start free
Research

The science is settled. Hypnosis works.

Fifty years of Dr. Spiegel's research, visible on brain imaging and proven in controlled trials. The key papers are below.

400+
peer-reviewed papers by Dr. Spiegel
50 years
at Stanford School of Medicine
282,893
Reveri sessions in the largest study of digital hypnosis
30–42%
pain reduction across clinical studies
Key papers

Six studies that matter.

npj Digital Medicine · 2025

Effects of app-delivered self-hypnosis on stress

282,893 Reveri sessions, 84,395 members. Stress fell 1.5 points on a ten-point scale within a session, and the tenth session worked like the first.

Read the paper →
The Lancet · 2000

Non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures

A randomised trial of 241 patients. With self-hypnosis, pain stayed flat through the procedure and patients used half the medication.

Read the trial →
Cerebral Cortex · 2017

Brain activity and functional connectivity associated with hypnosis

Imaging 57 people in and out of hypnosis. It is a distinct brain state: less alarm, more mind-body control, less second-guessing.

Read the paper →
Cell Reports Medicine · 2023

Brief structured respiration practices enhance mood and reduce arousal

With Andrew Huberman. Five minutes of cyclic sighing a day beat mindfulness meditation for mood and breathing rate.

Read the paper →
Scientific Reports · 2021

Shared cognitive mechanisms of hypnotizability with executive functioning

The more hypnotizable, the less you get stuck on a rule that has stopped working. Hypnotizability is a cognitive skill, not gullibility.

Read the paper →
American Journal of Medicine · 2021

Hypnosis: the most effective treatment you have yet to prescribe

Robust evidence for many conditions, the least collateral harm of any treatment for them, and almost no physicians trained to offer it.

Read the paper →

Charts are simplified illustrations of each paper's main finding; the papers carry the data.

Reveri's own study

What 84,395 members showed.

Published in npj Digital Medicine, December 2025, by Dr. Spiegel and eleven co-authors at Stanford and Reveri.

Read the paper →

It is observational, without a control group, so it shows what happened in real sessions rather than proving cause. Relief was consistent from session to session rather than growing: reliability, not a promise that the effect compounds.

−1.5

stress, within one session, on a ten-point scale

0.75

effect size (Cohen's d), large, in behavioural research

10 of 10

sessions with the same relief, the tenth works like the first

More

relief when members answered questions than when they only listened

Ten quiet minutes
The research brought you here. One session will tell you the rest.

You will know right away whether it works for you.